Recyclops: Good Riddance

I have been recycling (glass, plastic, cardboard) since the late ’90s, when I interviewed* an MTSU professor about it. Back then I kept a small bin on my back deck and about once a month I’d drive it over to the Kroger on the corner of Broad and Northfield. Jesse loved throwing the glass into the large metal bins.

Not long after Gerry and I bought the house on the other side of town, I investigated a recycling pickup service. There was one: All-In-One Recycling. Locally owned, very responsive. Young folks. I talked about them a lot on Facebook, recommending them, and I believe I was, in fact, responsible for gaining some customers for them. Sometimes after 2017, they sold their company to another local recycling company, so we became customers of the larger, county-wide Stones River Recycling.

But the pandemic came and brought hard times for the new owners.

Then these idiots (pardon my truthful language) from Utah—Recyclops—came in and “bought the company” in early 2022. If you look really hard on Recyclops’ current website—the old one was pretty upfront about everything—you’ll learn their corporate location is in Salt Lake City (elsewhere I’ve seen Oren). But they’ve expanded a lot since it was founded in 2013, and nowadays they’re quite cagey about how to contact them.

I can’t recall when I was approached to become a new/continuing customer (by email, with a link to their company website) but when I first began to pay attention, the recycling customers in our subdivision—which now had about two dozen Stones River clients, if not more—were losing their minds in posts in our Facebook group. The Recyclops prices were significantly higher; ultimately our subdivision was offered a slightly reduced rate to get us all on board. Gerry and I pay annually, since it’s cheapest.

Almost immediately, I noticed stupidity in Recyclops’ communication. Oh, they sent us emails, for sure. Read our blog! for example. But as I said on Facebook in June 2022:

Our recycling company is terrible about communicating clearly. Yesterday they sent a link to a blog they called “Common items that can’t be recycled.” The list includes pizza boxes, styrofoam, wire hangers, ceramics and pottery … and then there’s this:

“Some plastic bags and plastic wrap: We all use plastic bags when we go to the grocery store or out shopping right? Sadly, I know this one hurts because we were taught as kids we could recycle them, but the truth is plastic wrap CANNOT be accepted because the lightweight material clogs, tangles and can destroy machinery in our recycling centers. In this case I would recommend bringing your own recyclable or reusable bags for grocery shopping and when you’re out at a department store or mall.”

I read this and thought So …? Which plastic bags specifically?

The paragraph begins, “We all use plastic bags when we go to the grocery store or out shopping right?” But plastic bags dispensed by the grocery store are utterly different from plastic bags dispensed by a department store (which are thicker, stiffer, nothing at all like a grocery bag). Are they referring to both? Then they go on “the truth is, plastic wrap CANNOT be accepted because the lightweight material clogs, tangles and …” which mentions plastic WRAP.

I think Saran Wrap when you say wrap. But maybe they mean cellophane wrap (which isn’t actually plastic)? They say nothing at all about a plastic bag like a Ziploc bag, or a similar-weight bag new clothing is often shipped in. Are those recyclable? The point here is THIS BLOG DOESN’T HELP their customers. It doesn’t communicate their meaning clearly.

Yes, I am an editor, for sure. And the person writing that blog desperately needed an editor for a blog the company was disseminating by email to all of their clients nationwide. Even just the lack of a comma before the “right?” bugged me. Sloppy.

And then, in March 2023, they got under my skin again, not with a blog but with corporate emails:

The company—based in Utah—that is our recycling provider apparently doesn’t have anyone with word skills composing their corporate communications. For the year since they took over, the company’s emails are often confusing, sometimes don’t say enough, and on and on. It’s ridiculous, really, how poorly this company represents itself “on paper.”

In the last couple months, they’ve taking to sending a “tracking email” letting me know the collection truck is on the way. It also contains an option for me to leave a tip. But really? This is a service we pay for. Nonetheless, I’ve been ignoring that.

Today, I decided to unsubscribe—which I thought would be from the tracking emails. (I need to know if there is a delay or cancellation, not that they are on the way. That’s their service for which we pay; I assume they are doing it.) But the response was “unsubscribed from email from Recyclops.” Obviously** there is some email from Recyclops that I will need to receive. But there is no mention of that, nor no option to resubscribe until I can communicate with a human, though I must say that everyone associated with this company is a woefully inept communicator. [By this point I’d had two or three phone calls under my belt, all unsatisfying, with people who sounded like teenagers.]

Is it that I am a professional communicator and know better? Is it just that I’m old and used to a higher standard? Don’t large companies generally have at least one person on staff who is meant to compose public statements/emails/press releases, and so on? Or have standards for things like this changed? #lifeinthe21stcentury

The next month, on April 8, 2023, we were charged $264 for the coming year of weekly pickups. (We only put it out every other week; we don’t have that much to recycle.) I’m working on my taxes right now, so I have my receipt from that year: we were billed and I paid online on April 8.

Recyclops sends me three emails every Thursday: the first is titled “Track your order from Recyclops”; the second is “We’re on our way!”; and the third is “Review your service.” This is where they want me to leave them a tip, even on the days we put nothing out.

Now fast forward to 2024—specifically to Thursday, April 4th. Gerry checks the credit card statement online every morning over tea/coffee, and he says: “We’ve been charged $408 by Recyclops. Did you get a bill in email?”

That’s a helluva a price jump to get no warning for, yeah? We’re a bit breathless.

“No,” I tell him later, “I got nothing.” I checked again just to be sure. I get plenty of email from this crowd, but no warning of a pending bill. For example, I subscribe online to The Atlantic, and they send me an email two weeks out: you will be charged on X date. I subscribe to a deluxe, online version of the Merriam-Webster dictionary; they give me a full month’s warning. I could go on and on with automatic payments and subscriptions. But from Recyclops, nothing.

At this point, I already don’t like these Recyclops people. I have no respect for this company. So we talk it over and decide we’ll cancel the service. I go to the Recyclops website, which tells me if I have questions, problems, or whatever, I should call my local franchise, not the main office; the website offers me the list, and I call the number for Rutherford County.

I get voicemail. So, speaking slowly, I tell them my name, address, and phone number, and tell them the charge came as a surprise and we’ve decided to cancel our service, but please call me back. Meanwhile, Gerry goes to our credit card account online but can do nothing because the charge is listed as “pending.”

Again, this was a Thursday. I get no call back, no emails. The charge is still pending, according to BofA. So on Monday the 8th I call the local number again, and again it goes straight to voicemail. So Gerry calls the bank, files a complaint, and the $408 charge has a hold placed on it; the helpful person at the credit card bank tells us it may take ten days to get it all sorted out. And that got Recyclops’ attention. All of a sudden on Tuesday the 9th I have three new emails from Recyclops, one dated the 4th informing us we’re being charged (did they just not press SEND?) and the others informing us of the refund of $400. See, they had to charge us $8 for a week when we had nothing out for them to pick up.

I’ll take it.

I have better uses for the time I’ve spent writing this up, but Recyclops is crap, and I want to warn you off.

*One of my “spare” jobs was writing assignments for the MTSU alumni magazine. I believe the interviewee was Dr. Pat Doyle, a retired biology professor, who started MTSU’s recycling program back in 1972! Ahead of his time!
**Of course, they didn’t send the most important.

 

 

What Brings You Joy?

A friend of mine suggested a New Year exercise she’s been doing for years now: Set a timer for two minutes and write out all the things that bring you joy. So I did. It was easy:

Sybil and her family
cats, dogs, birds
growing herbs and then using them
reading and jigsaw puzzles
my besties
classical music, but really any music
writing up family stories, working on family tree to gift to my son
a good night’s sleep
editing, encouraging writers
my quiet life with my husband

Lady Sherlock

Oh, y’all. Sherry Thomas’s Lady Sherlock series is just amusing me to no end!

Lord Bancroft broke the silence. “Those are excellent garments, by the way, Miss Holmes.”

“Thank you, sir. Men’s clothes are far more interesting than I first assumed. I have now made a rather thorough study. Do feel free to inquire,” she said solemnly, “should you find yourself with questions concerning the latest fashions in gentlemanly attire.”

“I will be sure to take advantage of your expertise, if and when the need arises,” the perpetually stylish Lord Bancroft answered with equal gravity. “Have you been handling cases that necessitate dressing as a man?”

“Not yet. But Mrs. Watson and I both thought that it wouldn’t hurt to be prepared. It would be only a matter of time before such a case arose.”

“What made you think that you’d need men’s garments for a two-week stay in the country?”

“I didn’t think so, but they are rather like new toys. I didn’t want to part with them.”

—from The Hollow of Fear, by Sherry Thomas

This on-going series combines two things I love: Regency (in this case, actually, Victorian) romances and cozy mysteries. With a twist. You see, in this series, according to Wikipedia,

Charlotte Holmes, the youngest daughter of the noble-but-impoverished Lord and Lady Holmes, possesses a razor-keen intellect and unique talents for observation and deductive reasoning, but her parents under-value these gifts, declaring them off-putting to a potential husband. Before her first Season, Charlotte, declaring herself uninterested in marriage, strikes a bargain with her father: she will participate in the Season, but if she does not accept any potential suitors, her father will finance her education to become the headmistress of a girls’ school (one of the few vocations in Victorian England which allows an unmarried woman a sufficient income). Her father agrees, but later reneges.

She’s weird, she doesn’t fit in, her parents don’t like her—and Charlotte’s OK with that. (I’ve deduced over the course of this never-ending story that in today’s words, she’s autistic.) She has a sister who loves her, and a childhood friend—now a grown-up Lord Ingram—who does too. If you get my drift.

Because she is brilliant, she has been passing tips about newsworthy crimes to the Metropolitan Police … and this leads ultimately to a fresh and delightful new version of Sherlock … er, Charlotte Holmes books. I don’t want to give too much away, and I want you to delight in the way it all unfolds. These stories are a slow burn in the best way.

1. A Study in Scarlet Women, October 2016.
2. A Conspiracy in Belgravia, September 2017.
3. The Hollow of Fear, October 2018.
4. The Art of Theft, October 2019.
5. Murder on Cold Street, October 2020.
6. Miss Moriarty, I Presume?, November 2021.
7. A Tempest At Sea, March 2023.
8. A Ruse of Shadows, June 2024.

I order the Lady Sherlock books the minute they’re put up for preorder.

 

Violence Is Ever-Present

Last night I watched MSNBC’s Chris Hayes interviewing Miles Taylor—a former US national security official and writer. This was the theme of it: People who, in ways large and small, “cross”* Donald Trump face threats of violence. You’ve already seen this in the news with people whose names you recognize—Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Letitia James, Ruby and Shaye Freeman, Judge Engoron, Judge Chutkan, Mitt Romney, and I could go on—but there are many more whose names you don’t know.

Hayes spent the first nine minutes of his opening monologue on this theme, in which he said:

You just cannot separate Trump’s performance from these ever-present, deeply ominous, anti-democratic threats of harassment and violence. It’s just an essential part of what Donald Trump stands for and how he and his movement pursue political power.

But the Miles Taylor interview was in the last fifteen minutes of the show and I can’t find video for it. (Transcripts are usually available ten to thirty days later.) The upshot, though, was that we don’t hear about the threats to behind-the-scene folks in government (including election workers) and even in journalism. But it’s bad, Taylor says. So bad that good people are leaving their professions because they want to protect their families, their lives. Because they are frightened.

After all, we saw what happened on January 6, 2021 with our own eyes. I’m reading Ryan J. Reilly’s Seditions Hunters: How January 6th Broke the Justice System, which documents just how much out-in-the-open the anger and the intentions to do violence were. It started in early December 2020.

It’s never really stopped, y’all.

And we’re still eleven months out from the actual election. Think about it: The criminal part of the GOP spent a month (December 2020) stirring up people for what happened on January 6th. They’re already working on reacting to the results of the election that will happen on November 5, 2024. Dear Jesus.

* Piss off.

 

 

 

Jerks Do Exist

This guy crossed my online path a couple days ago (we have always had mutual friends), and I decided to have a look at …The Kenny H. Saga, eight years later.

We worked for the same company, thirty years ago, shortly after my divorce. Back then I still couldn’t open my mouth in Tennessee without people noticing I hadn’t grown up here. True, I’d mostly grown up in California, and my verbal accent was generated there … but I’d gone to kindergarten in Middle Tennessee, and my father’s family history in Middle Tennessee goes back to before the Civil War. Kenny wouldn’t have known any of this, though, and, again, it would not have been evident when we worked in the same office in the ’90s, when everyone knew “you ain’t from around here, are you?”

To be frank, that’s such an unfriendly question, Southern rednecks. Try rephrasing.

But here’s the story. I hadn’t physically seen Kenny in years. We’d had very little social media contact. Every once in a while he’d show up, leave a comment or a “like” and that would be it.

On this particular day in 2016, I left an entry on Facebook:

Gerry and I have been talking about little trips to take later this year—just, say, a long weekend, and Charleston came up. But I am editing a detailed history of the place … and it just saddens me. That said, I realize we cannot change the past. (sigh)

I am affected by and learn from books I edit a lot. I am a person who enjoys learning. That week I was working on a book built around the Charleston church shooting, but it was so much more, going back literally to the colonial era into Charleston’s history. And it made me sad.

Within minutes, a friend of mine, Evelyn (born and raised in Louisiana, career in NYC, retired in Florida), had commented, “Sad to say, *most* Southern U.S. history is sad. Also infuriating.” She added a sad emoji.

I answered that, “Yes, Gerry pointed that out. But in Charleston they didn’t even bother to hide it. (sigh)” … and then I went off to have lunch with a couple of editor friends. This next bit—and it’s quite a conversation—happened while I was gone. Thank goodness Gerry was here.

• • •

Kenny responded to Evelyn:
And as for someone who was raised in the south and has lived in the north for the past 15 years, I find the remark about the south ignorant. Both sides have their great things as well as their bad things.

Kenny:
And to say to Evelyn, please stay where you are and don’t visit the south.

Marina:
No one said the South is bad. No one said “the north” is better. Becoming upset and bringing up old ideas just shows how ingrained such thoughts are in peoples’ minds. Nothing ignorant was said either, it’s true that much of the past in the South is sad and infuriating, but that comment has nothing to do with any mention of anywhere else. It would be relevant if anyone had mentioned anywhere else, but no one did. To try and show people that a place is “good,” it’s best to avoid attacking someone else and telling them to never go there.

Kenny:
And I don’t need a lesson from you Marina.

Marina:
Nope you don’t, no one here needed a lesson. Conversations go in as many ways as there are people to participate, and no one can make anyone else learn from it if they aren’t willing. Have a great day. 🙂

Kenny:
If you or this conservation had a lesson to learn, I would be open to it. It didn’t. You have a great day as well.

Gerry:
Facebook is a wonderful facility for people who like to bully.

Kenny:
So I’m a bully by expressing my opinion? Or for defending the part of the country I was raised? From what I understand, you just moved to the US and the south, I think you have some things to learn. Start by Learning the definition of bully.

Gerry:
If the cap fits.

Kenny:
Well we wouldn’t want your wife to be friends with a bully now would we? I can rectify that problem.

Gerry:
LOL

Kenny:
You’re an asshole too.

Gerry:
I guess one doesn’t have to dig too far to find a person’s real character.

• • •

At this point Kenny unfriended me and left the conversation, presumably to stew. (I have no idea why I can still see it here in 2024, but I’m delighted that I can document it.) Anyway, the conversation went on without him.

• • •

Marina:
I for one learned a lot from this conversation … Some people are ticking time bombs, best to stay clear. 😕

Evelyn:
Jamie, I have blocked your bullying friend Kenny Whatshisname, so he won’t see this post. But if you feel like it, you can tell him that I was born and raised in Louisiana. Not that it’s any of his business, but he’s *so damn sure* I don’t know what I’m talking about. Ha!

Me:
Evelyn, I’ve been out for a couple hours and just saw this conflagration. A part of me is amused (we’ll discuss further) and a part of me is sickened. My first thought was he must be having a really bad day, although real grownups don’t take their bad days out on people they don’t know on Facebook. More later.

Me:
Marina, my apologies to you, too, honey. xoxox

Evelyn:
Jamie — No problems. The e-world is full of people like that. I have not one you-know-what to give. 😉 LOL

Me:
Gerry just said to me “I’ve never seen Evelyn or Marina say anything bad to anyone, they’re always polite!”

Evelyn:
Because we were raised to have manners. 😉

Me:
Anyway, no matter—Kenny has unfriended me! And all this happened while I was out having a good time!

Gerry:
Never leave your Irish husband in charge of Facebook.

Evelyn:
Well, *if* you miss his friendship, then I apologize that my comment apparently was the spark that made him burst into flame.

Me:
Evelyn, LOL!!! Naw, there is no problem here.

Evelyn:
IMHO, Gerry Hampson wins Facebook, today. 🙂

Me:
Gerry, I trust my Irish husband implicitly.

Marina:
No apology needed, you cannot predict how anyone will act, and I felt very sorry for getting into it on your page with a person known to you.

Barbara:
Wow! You all did a fine job responding to this “gentleman.” Special call out to Gerry.

Roz:
Evelyn, Marina, Gerry—what shining examples of courtesy you have all shown in the face of very poor behaviour. You should all be very proud of yourselves.

Nancy:
Wow!!! Bless His Heart!! … As we say in the South …

Sallie:
Gerry, I adore you! You are freaking awesome.

• • •

Sometime during all of this, I came home from the aforementioned lunch, and posted a second time:

Goodness! A gal goes out for a couple hours to have lunch with friends (enjoyed it!), and Facebook explodes while she’s gone. (sigh)

That was a sarcastic sigh. Gerry had directed me to the mess (and apologized) as soon as I walked in the door, but I laughed out loud as I read it. No apology necessary, honey!

In closure: Kenny always was an asshole and behaved badly—though not this badly—at the company we both worked for. Later he left the company, moved to NYC (that’s where he was when this “dialogue” occurred) and seemed happier from what I saw on social media and heard from friends who kept in touch with him in person. But he was certainly not happy on this day, Jan 5, 2016, when he let loose on my husband and friends. I can’t believe he still gets work because he truly is such an asshole.

 

 

A Long December

… a long December and there’s reason to believe
Maybe this year will be better than the last
I can’t remember all the times I tried to tell myself
To hold on to these moments as they pass …

—“A Long December,” songwriter Adam Duritz, lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group, from the album Recovering the Satellites (1996)

• • •

Hold on to your moments, friends. Happy New Year.

Is That a Smirk on Your Face, or Are You Just Happy to See Me?

Originally published in Read Play Edit on 23 January 2012

Here’s a word that gets misused a lot, at least in the manuscripts I’ve seen in recent years. Smirk.

It can be a noun or a verb. But no matter how it gets used, I think some writers are missing the fine nuances in smirk, the subtleties that distinguish it from, say, smile. Or grin. (Or even grin wickedly, although I like a wicked grin myself.)

Smirk has a slightly negative connotation in my mind. It’s a smart-aleck smile. Even a smarmy smile. It’s not a genuine smile. Not really a happy smile. Not particularly friendly. It’s smug, condescending; it’s closer to a sneer than a smile, to my way of thinking, a way of mocking the situation or the person at whom it’s directed.

My favorite dictionary defines the verb form thus: “to smile in an affected or conceited manner: smile with affected complaisance; to simper.” The noun is described as “an affected smile: simper (the solemnity of the ceremony was broken by smirks, whispered jokes, and repressed titters …).” Yeah, that’s it exactly! (And simper, if you’re interested, is to smile in an affected, coy, or silly manner.)

But what I’m often seeing is smirk used as a substitute for smile—and that doesn’t work for me. (We all expand our vocabularies by reading words in context, especially once we’ve quit bringing home those mimeographed lists of twenty words we have to know by Friday. So every time smirk is misused in a novel, someone, somewhere, attaches the wrong definition to it in his brain’s vocab list. Yes, I’m talking about the dumbing down of society here, doggone it, and I’m making my little stand against it.)

I’m the sort of editor (and writer) who generally likes simplicity in the descriptive narrative. Just call a smile a smile. (Guy Kawasaki is another a big fan of smiling, and spends a lot of time explaining the difference between a genuine smile—a Duchenne smile—and what he calls a “Pan Am smile,” illustrated here in panel 3.)

There are nuances, of course: one can grin (showing the teeth in a broad smile, particularly to show amusement or laughter) or leer or even beam (with pride, say). I used grin wickedly above, but excessive use of adverbs is frowned upon these days, so you’d want to watch phrases like smiled happily, not least because it’s redundant.

But just because you see smirk in your thesaurus in the entry for smile, it’s still a very specific action; a smirk is not a direct substitute for a smile, my friends. Any parent of a teenager could tell you that. 🙂

 

 

 

Unimpressed

I gave an author I was not impressed by a second chance, and she failed the test. The first thing that got her a failing grade was her use—twenty-seven times in a 370+-page book—of the word smirk.

That’s too many. And by that I mean half the time it was used incorrectly (I’ve written an article about the word smirk here) but mostly I just mean the reader does begin to notice repeated use of a word. Does this writer just have a small vocabulary?

There were, in fact, other questionable word choices. She started having characters “grit out” dialogue. (“‘Nora,’ I grit out.” Um, what? Grit can be used as a verb, sure, but as a dialogue tag? Ugh. No.) I also dislike the use of the word frame for body and quirk for what eyebrows do (yes, I know the dictionary includes this usage but some writers just take it too far). I’m a proponent of low-key, simple, elegant writing, so that the story takes center stage.

I’m not impressed by “Water rolls off us in droves, soaking the entryway rugs” either. Yes, I know, I know, I grew up reading literary fiction, great authors, and I’m a snot. I also love more casual writing, romances, humorous fiction, feel-good fiction (what’s been called “up lit”), and I’ve read plenty of it that’s been nicely written.

Other issues: The author switched tenses quite a bit. An important detail for the story-worthy problem (why are these three siblings fighting?) doesn’t appear until more than a hundred pages in.

And then … she gave the middle brother a job as an editor. No, seriously. He has no background in publishing, but “I have two biographies I have to edit today, and both have put me to sleep within the first fifty pages.” That made this real-life editor sit up. What? Later the reader learns, “when my plans … didn’t pan out right away, I started freelance editing, something I’d done on and off in college for extra cash. Before I knew it, a nonfiction publisher picked me up, and I’ve been stuck ever since. I only wish the material was more interesting.”

This bothers me, I am sure, because when I started working for the publishing company and later started editing freelance, it seemed like a lot of people I hadn’t heard from in a long time turned up, saying things like, “I like to read, can I be an editor?” No. It’s not that easy. What this character did in college was probably proofread his friend’s essays and other papers. I doubt he edited, not like one does to a manuscript of a full-length book, fiction or nonfiction. A nonfiction publisher picked him up? I am calling bullshit on this.

So I wonder, Where was the actual editor?

Oh, quite possibly there isn’t one. This author’s books list her publisher as Montlake … the romance imprint for Amazon. (sigh) Lesson learned. I’m done.